| Author(s) | |
|---|---|
| Publication Year | |
| Publisher |
R. v. Mills, 1999
From: The Court and the Charter
$1.40
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that provisions of the Criminal Code governing the production of private records to an accused in sexual offence proceedings did not violate the accused’s right to make full answer and defence or the presumption of innocence. A dissenting opinion would have read in limiting language to two of the provisions.
Contributors
Tom Bateman
Thomas Bateman is Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at St. Thomas University in Fredericton.
Janet Hieber
Janet Hiebert is a Professor in the Department of Political Studies at Queen’s University in Kingston.
Rainer Knopff
Rainer Knopff is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Calgary.
Peter Russell
Peter H. Russell is Professor of political science (Emeritus) at the University of Toronto.
