Author(s) | |
---|---|
Publication Year | |
Publisher |
An example of regulatory chill
From: Sold Down the Yangtze
$1.00
Opponents of investor-state arbitration have long warned that
it may lead to so-called “regulatory chill,” by creating financial
risks for countries that deter responsible regulation of foreign
investors.
Contributors
Gus Van Harten
As an expert in investment deals and international law, GUS VAN HARTEN is uniquely qualified to explain what the Canada-China agreement means for Canada. He is currently a professor at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto, working previously as a tenured faculty member in the Department of Law at the London School of Economics in the United Kingdom. He has written over twenty academic studies on investment treaties, and has provided commentary to governments, international organizations, and media such as Bloomberg, the CBC, The Globe and Mail, the Guardian, and the Toronto Star. He lives in Burlington, Ontario.