Peter Russell
Showing 113–128 of 179 results
| Title & Subtitle | Abstract | Contributors | Pages | Year | Purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
From ![]() Reference re Senate Reform, 2014 |
The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously decided that the majority of changes to the Senate contemplated in a direct reference from the federal government could only be achieved through … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 11 | 2017 | $1.10 Add |
|
From ![]() Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 |
A divided Supreme Court of Canada ruled that most provisions of the federal Assisted Human Reproduction Act were an invalid intrusion on provincial jurisdiction by attempting to regulate … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 6 | 2017 | $0.60 Add |
|
From ![]() Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 (Nadon), 2014 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a supernumerary judge of the Federal Court of Appeal was ineligible to be appointed to the Supreme Court as a representative from Quebec … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 11 | 2017 | $1.10 Add |
|
From ![]() Aboriginal Rights: Introduction |
Introduction to key Supreme Court decisions related to Indigenous Peoples | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 5 | 2017 | $0.50 Add |
|
From ![]() Referendum on the Future of the Senate: A Round TableFrom: Essential Readings in Canadian Government and Politics, 2nd Edition |
Excerpts of speeches by four senators in 2007 in response to a motion in the Senate for a national referendum on the abolition of the Senate. | Debra Thompson; François Rocher; Peter Russell | 9 | 2015 | $0.90 Add |
|
From ![]() Reference re Alberta Statutes (Alberta Press Case), 1938 |
Two members of the Supreme Court of Canada, in holding that the Act to ensure the Publication of Accurate News and Information was beyond the constitutional authority of Alberta legislature, … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 6 | 2017 | $0.60 Add |
|
From ![]() RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1995 |
A divided Supreme Court of Canada issued several opinions on whether a law prohibiting advertising and promotion of tobacco products and the requirement on tobacco manufacturers to place an … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 12 | 2017 | $1.20 Add |
|
From ![]() Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 |
The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the right of a Sikh student to wear a kirpan to high school on the basis of freedom of religion. | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 11 | 2017 | $1.10 Add |
|
From ![]() Robertson and Rosetanni v. The Queen, 1963 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada, in looking at the effect of the Lord’s Day Act rather than its purpose, upheld a conviction for operating a bowling alley in contravention of the … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 13 | 2017 | $1.30 Add |
|
From ![]() Roncarelli v. Duplessis, 1959 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that the Quebec premier was liable under the Civil Code for damages for purporting to authorize and instruct the manager of the Quebec Liquor … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 6 | 2017 | $0.60 Add |
|
From ![]() Ford v. Quebec (Attorney General), 1988 |
The Supreme Court of Canada struck down a Quebec law requiring public signs and posters and commercial advertising to be in French only, and allowing only the French version of a firm name to be used. | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 19 | 2017 | $1.90 Add |
|
From ![]() Royal Commission on Bilingualism and BiculturalismFrom: Essential Readings in Canadian Government and Politics, 2nd Edition |
Excerpt of a 1967 Royal Commission Report by A. Davidson Dunton and André Laurendeau stating that the principle of equality between the two founding peoples requires that the linguistic … | Debra Thompson; François Rocher; Peter Russell | 3 | 2015 | $0.30 Add |
|
From ![]() Royal Commission on the Status of Women in CanadaFrom: Essential Readings in Canadian Government and Politics, 2nd Edition |
Excerpt of a 1970 Royal Commission Report recommending measures to remedy a lack of equality between women and men regarding rights and freedoms. | Debra Thompson; François Rocher; Peter Russell | 6 | 2015 | $0.60 Add |
|
From ![]() Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan, 2015 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that a law prohibiting designated employees from participating in a strike substantially interfered with a right to a meaningful process of … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 9 | 2017 | $0.90 Add |
|
From ![]() Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan, 2015 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that a law prohibiting designated employees from participating in a strike substantially interfered with a right to a meaningful process of … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 13 | 2017 | $1.30 Add |
|
From ![]() Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, 2013 |
The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously held that although provisions of The Saskatchewan Human Rights Code prohibiting hate speech infringed freedom of expression and freedom of conscience and … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 12 | 2017 | $1.20 Add |






