Foreign
Showing 17–32 of 52 results
| Title & Subtitle | Abstract | Contributors | Pages | Year | Purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
From  Laura Dawson’s lawn dartsFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
Analyzes an interview with Laura Dawson about her opinion on the FIPA. He concludes the interview worked as a sort of damage control on the part of the governement | Gus Van Harten | 14 | 2015 | $1.40 Add |
|
From Lawrence HermanFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
Analyzes Lawrence Herman’s opinions on the FIPA | Gus Van Harten | 15 | 2015 | $1.50 Add |
|
From Market access for Chinese investors, but not for Canadian investors From: Sold Down the Yangtze |
Chinese companies have a general right in the FIPA to buy into Canada’s economy, which is then subject to limitations in some cases. On the other hand, Canadian investors have no general … | Gus Van Harten | 11 | 2015 | $1.10 Add |
|
From Milos Barutciski and Matthew Kronby, part one From: Sold Down the Yangtze |
Another group that emerged to defend the FIPA after it became controversial was lawyers who work in investor-state arbitration | Gus Van Harten | 11 | 2015 | $1.10 Add |
|
From Milos Barutciski and Matthew Kronby, part two From: Sold Down the Yangtze |
The key claim in Barutciski and Kronby’s Globe and Mail article was that the FIPA would benefit Canada. When they made this claim, I suggest that Barutciski and Kronby should have … | Gus Van Harten | 7 | 2015 | $0.70 Add |
|
From No standing for CanadiansFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
brought to you by the FIPA. Arbitrators can make decisions that affect Canadians, without ever hearing from them. | Gus Van Harten | 6 | 2015 | $0.60 Add |
|
From Other explanations for a lopsided dealFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
analyzes other opinions about why the government would accept such a lopsided arrangement with China | Gus Van Harten | 9 | 2015 | $0.90 Add |
|
From Outcomes of lawsuitsFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
it is next to impossible to evaluate what is happening in settlements. Even if we know that a settlement exists, its terms are rarely public. The terms should be public, at least in a democratic … | Gus Van Harten | 8 | 2015 | $0.80 Add |
|
From  NEW! Partner to perilThe Trudeau record on relations with China and emerging markets From: The Trudeau Record |
This chapter reviews the Trudeau government’s position on China and emerging global markets. | Jeremy Paltiel | 13 | 2024 | $1.30 Add |
|
From Possible conflicts over Canadian jobs, health, and the environment From: Sold Down the Yangtze |
not all Chinese investment in Canada is objectionable. Yet, for many Canadians, it seems possible that Chinese investment will undermine their priorities when it comes to jobs, health, or the … | Gus Van Harten | 9 | 2015 | $0.90 Add |
|
From PrefaceFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
Outline of how Van Harten will approach his analysis of the FIPA and what is wrong with the deal for both Canadians and Chinese people | Gus Van Harten | 6 | 2015 | $0.60 Add |
|
From Protecting Canadian investors, with a catchFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
The FIPA does provide stronger protection for Canadian investors in China but here Van Harten outlines why they are not strong protections | Gus Van Harten | 6 | 2015 | $0.60 Add |
|
From  Rebuilding the House of Labour |
Presents the internal pressures and new dilemmas facing the labour movement today | Craig Heron | 29 | 2012 | $2.90 Add |
|
From Secret deals with ChinaFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
Another troubling thing about the China FIPA is its special allowances for secret lawsuits and secret settlements. In this chapter, I outline this problem and why it is so serious under the FIPA. | Gus Van Harten | 8 | 2015 | $0.80 Add |
|
From Settlements of lawsuits, known and unknownFrom: Sold Down the Yangtze |
Analyzes some murky NAFTA settlements to demonstrate why we should be wary of FIPA | Gus Van Harten | 8 | 2015 | $0.80 Add |
Sold Down the YangtzeCanada's lopsided investment deal with China |
When legal experts finally saw the terms of the investment deal Canada had signed with China, they could hardly believe what their eyes. The deal was unprecedented — Canada had never given … | 368 | View |
