Confidentiality & Ethics

Showing 33–47 of 47 results

Title & Subtitle Abstract Contributors Pages Year Purchase
From

The TCPS Is Released

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Examines the release of the tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving human participants (TCPS). And how this would effect the ethics review process ; 6 $0.60 Add
From

The Russel Ogden Decision Review

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Examines the decision review that was conducted by the university regarding Russell Ogden’s research, clearly accounts its methods and mandates ; 11 $1.10 Add
From

“Researchers Should Be Aware of the Relevant Law”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

The seeking out of a formal legal opinion regarding research confidentiality and examining other cases involving research confidentiality and their outcomes ; 21 $2.10 Add
From

Implementing Wigmore Part I:

Prerequisites for Consideration

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at what it means to prepare for Wigmore consideration. This chapter examins the first three criteria by drawing on Ogden’s successful application of them ; 25 $2.50 Add
From

Implementing Wigmore Part II:

When the Rubber Hits the Road

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Examiniation of criteria four of the Wigmore consideration, a review of the interests that third parties have pitted against research confidentiality, the research and research participant in US … ; 29 $2.90 Add
From

Kangaroo Court

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at the appeal and disagreement procedure that was launch when the ethics committee rejected the proposal of research into off-street prostitution trade in Vancouver. The length of time for … ; 18 $1.80 Add
From

Limited Confidentiality 2.0:

The SFU Ethics Committee’s “Duty to Report”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at how the ethics committee’s duty to report policy violated the legal principles established in Smith v Jones ; 13 $1.30 Add
From

Making Ethics More Legal, or Law More Ethical?

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

The creatiion of a new ethics policy at SFU, disciplinary standards regarding ethics and law, the granting agencies clarify their position on ethics and law, three legal opinions on … ; 26 $2.60 Add
From

What If?

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

looks at three different sources influence on the creation of how to address when a higher ethical consideration would lead a researcher to violate a confidence ; 17 $1.70 Add
From

The National Scene

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at the creation of the TCPS creating a bureaucratication of the ethics regulation process nationally ; 19 $1.90 Add
From

Answer to a Riddle

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at how TCPS-2 is an improvement as it emphasized the fundamental importance of confidentiality to research ; 4 $0.40 Add
From

University Accountability on Trial

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at a unversity being accoutable to defend the research it approves against legal challenges ; 8 $0.80 Add
From

The “Jimmy” Interview:

The Importance of “Good Facts”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Although such cases are extremely rare, if one did arise, we wanted to make sure researchers, REBs, universities, and granting agencies all know what it means to defend confidentiality to the … ; 13 $1.30 Add
From

Going the Distance

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

In this concluding chapter we bring together the main themes of our examination of the ethics and law of research confidentiality by reflecting on how much things have changed — or not … ; 33 $3.30 Add
From

Select Bibliography

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Might want to include with each chapter ; 11 $1.10 Add