John Lowman

Showing 1–16 of 32 results

Title & Subtitle Abstract Contributors Pages Year Purchase

Protecting Research Confidentiality

What happens when law and ethics collide

Lawyers and their clients can talk in complete confidence, secure that the law protects what they say from being revealed to anyone. Priests can hear confessions with reasonable certainty that no … ; 432 View
From

Threats to Research Confidentiality

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Examines the threats to research confidentiality currently being faced by academics through outlining the purpose of the book as a whole, lawful threats to research confidentiality, What is at … ; 14 $1.40 Add
From

Ogden’s Research on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Beginning of their analysis of Russell Ogden’s case regarding the subpoena he received on his research into assisted suicide, looks at his history with Simon Fraser University’s … ; 11 $1.10 Add
From

The Coroner, the Media, and SFU

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at Assisted Suicide in the News, The media and Ogden – their want of an expert and finding one in Ogden, Ogden and the SFU Administration ; 12 $1.20 Add
From

Defending Research Participants

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

An Introduction to understand evidentiary Priviledge, statutory priviledgem priviledge in common law and how it is decided on a case by case basis (wigmore criteria), looks at Ogden’s … ; 13 $1.30 Add
From

Protecting Research Participants, or Protecting the University from Research Participants?

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at institutional conflict of interest when it comes to academic research involving human participants, ethics under the law, and the limited confidentiality afforded to researchers ; 11 $1.10 Add
From

Ogden v. SFU

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Ogden resolves to hold the univeristy responsible for his legal bills as a breach of contractual obligation between himself and the university as he followed every policy and procedue outlined to … ; 8 $0.80 Add
From

The Federal Government’s Research Ethics Agenda

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at developing a Canadian research ethics code when involving human participants the tri-council working group drafted a code for those seeking to apply for funding from the three major … ; 8 $0.80 Add
From

Justice for Ogden

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

The SFU School of Criminology speaks out in support of Ogden, the colleagues on his side, and the call to review the university’s conduct regarding the Ogden subpoena ; 9 $0.90 Add
From

Challenging Institutional Conflict of Interest

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at the challenge to the institutional conflict of interest and the idea of limited confidentiality that was undertaken because of the Ogden case ; 13 $1.30 Add
From

Meeting with the Ethics Committee

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at meeting with the SFU’s ethics committee in their conduct in the Ogden Case ; 12 $1.20 Add
From

Caveat Emptor Ethics

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at limited confidentiality and liability in terms of academic research using the SFU and Ogden as the main case study to anaylze the problem ; 10 $1.00 Add
From

An Unusual Research Opportunity

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at a proposal regarding ethnographic research on prostitution and the ethics committee’s response to it at SFU, analyzes the question does all research matter, and looks at addressing … ; 18 $1.80 Add
From

SFU’s Administrative Culture:

“Up On Dat Mountain, Dey Is Stuck Real Good”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Our campaign to persuade the SFU administration to institute an independent review of the “Ogden decision” benefitted from the more general turmoil at SFU during a period when the … ; 10 $1.00 Add
From

SFU’s “Hollow and Timid” Defence of Academic Freedom

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

The independent inquiry into the university’s decision making regarding Russell Odgen’s research and the release of Judge Daniel Steinberg’s decision on Ogden vs. SFU ; 5 $0.50 Add
From

Dialogue with the Ethics Committee Continues

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at the further dialogue with the ethics committee in an effort to get their research underwhere before the opportunity vanished ; 8 $0.80 Add