John Lowman
Showing 17–31 of 31 results
| Title & Subtitle | Abstract | Contributors | Pages | Year | Purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
From ![]() Protecting Research Participants, or Protecting the University from Research Participants? |
Looks at institutional conflict of interest when it comes to academic research involving human participants, ethics under the law, and the limited confidentiality afforded to researchers | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 11 | 2014 | $1.10 Add |
|
From ![]() “Researchers Should Be Aware of the Relevant Law” |
The seeking out of a formal legal opinion regarding research confidentiality and examining other cases involving research confidentiality and their outcomes | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 21 | 2014 | $2.10 Add |
|
From ![]() Select Bibliography |
Might want to include with each chapter | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 11 | 2014 | $1.10 Add |
|
From ![]() SFU’s Administrative Culture:“Up On Dat Mountain, Dey Is Stuck Real Good” |
Our campaign to persuade the SFU administration to institute an independent review of the “Ogden decision” benefitted from the more general turmoil at SFU during a period when the … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 10 | 2014 | $1.00 Add |
|
From ![]() SFU’s “Hollow and Timid” Defence of Academic Freedom |
The independent inquiry into the university’s decision making regarding Russell Odgen’s research and the release of Judge Daniel Steinberg’s decision on Ogden vs. SFU | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 5 | 2014 | $0.50 Add |
|
From ![]() The Coroner, the Media, and SFU |
Looks at Assisted Suicide in the News, The media and Ogden – their want of an expert and finding one in Ogden, Ogden and the SFU Administration | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 12 | 2014 | $1.20 Add |
|
From ![]() The Federal Government’s Research Ethics Agenda |
Looks at developing a Canadian research ethics code when involving human participants the tri-council working group drafted a code for those seeking to apply for funding from the three major … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 8 | 2014 | $0.80 Add |
|
From ![]() The “Jimmy” Interview:The Importance of “Good Facts” |
Although such cases are extremely rare, if one did arise, we wanted to make sure researchers, REBs, universities, and granting agencies all know what it means to defend confidentiality to the … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 13 | 2014 | $1.30 Add |
|
From ![]() The National Scene |
Looks at the creation of the TCPS creating a bureaucratication of the ethics regulation process nationally | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 19 | 2014 | $1.90 Add |
|
From ![]() The Russel Ogden Decision Review |
Examines the decision review that was conducted by the university regarding Russell Ogden’s research, clearly accounts its methods and mandates | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 11 | 2014 | $1.10 Add |
|
From ![]() The TCPS Is Released |
Examines the release of the tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving human participants (TCPS). And how this would effect the ethics review process | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 6 | 2014 | $0.60 Add |
|
From ![]() Threats to Research Confidentiality |
Examines the threats to research confidentiality currently being faced by academics through outlining the purpose of the book as a whole, lawful threats to research confidentiality, What is at … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 14 | 2014 | $1.40 Add |
|
From ![]() University Accountability on Trial |
Looks at a unversity being accoutable to defend the research it approves against legal challenges | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 8 | 2014 | $0.80 Add |
|
From ![]() What If? |
looks at three different sources influence on the creation of how to address when a higher ethical consideration would lead a researcher to violate a confidence | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 17 | 2014 | $1.70 Add |
|
From ![]() What the Dickens? |
Since the beginning of the debate on limited confidentiality, we have drawn attention to the ethics committee’s lack of due diligence because, in the process of imposing its doctrine on SFU … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 16 | 2014 | $1.60 Add |




