John Lowman

Showing 1–16 of 31 results

Title & Subtitle Abstract Contributors Pages Year Purchase
From
An Unusual Research Opportunity

An Unusual Research Opportunity

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at a proposal regarding ethnographic research on prostitution and the ethics committee’s response to it at SFU, analyzes the question does all research matter, and looks at addressing … ; 18 $1.80 Add
From
Answer to a Riddle

Answer to a Riddle

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at how TCPS-2 is an improvement as it emphasized the fundamental importance of confidentiality to research ; 4 $0.40 Add
From
Caveat Emptor Ethics

Caveat Emptor Ethics

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at limited confidentiality and liability in terms of academic research using the SFU and Ogden as the main case study to anaylze the problem ; 10 $1.00 Add
From
Challenging Institutional Conflict of Interest

Challenging Institutional Conflict of Interest

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at the challenge to the institutional conflict of interest and the idea of limited confidentiality that was undertaken because of the Ogden case ; 13 $1.30 Add
From
Defending Research Participants

Defending Research Participants

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

An Introduction to understand evidentiary Priviledge, statutory priviledgem priviledge in common law and how it is decided on a case by case basis (wigmore criteria), looks at Ogden’s … ; 13 $1.30 Add
From
Dialogue with the Ethics Committee Continues

Dialogue with the Ethics Committee Continues

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at the further dialogue with the ethics committee in an effort to get their research underwhere before the opportunity vanished ; 8 $0.80 Add
From
Going the Distance

Going the Distance

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

In this concluding chapter we bring together the main themes of our examination of the ethics and law of research confidentiality by reflecting on how much things have changed — or not … ; 33 $3.30 Add
From
Implementing Wigmore Part I:

Implementing Wigmore Part I:

Prerequisites for Consideration

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at what it means to prepare for Wigmore consideration. This chapter examins the first three criteria by drawing on Ogden’s successful application of them ; 25 $2.50 Add
From
Implementing Wigmore Part II:

Implementing Wigmore Part II:

When the Rubber Hits the Road

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Examiniation of criteria four of the Wigmore consideration, a review of the interests that third parties have pitted against research confidentiality, the research and research participant in US … ; 29 $2.90 Add
From
Justice for Ogden

Justice for Ogden

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

The SFU School of Criminology speaks out in support of Ogden, the colleagues on his side, and the call to review the university’s conduct regarding the Ogden subpoena ; 9 $0.90 Add
From
Kangaroo Court

Kangaroo Court

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at the appeal and disagreement procedure that was launch when the ethics committee rejected the proposal of research into off-street prostitution trade in Vancouver. The length of time for … ; 18 $1.80 Add
From
Limited Confidentiality 2.0:

Limited Confidentiality 2.0:

The SFU Ethics Committee’s “Duty to Report”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at how the ethics committee’s duty to report policy violated the legal principles established in Smith v Jones ; 13 $1.30 Add
From
Making Ethics More Legal, or Law More Ethical?

Making Ethics More Legal, or Law More Ethical?

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

The creatiion of a new ethics policy at SFU, disciplinary standards regarding ethics and law, the granting agencies clarify their position on ethics and law, three legal opinions on … ; 26 $2.60 Add
From
Meeting with the Ethics Committee

Meeting with the Ethics Committee

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at meeting with the SFU’s ethics committee in their conduct in the Ogden Case ; 12 $1.20 Add
From
Ogden v. SFU

Ogden v. SFU

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Ogden resolves to hold the univeristy responsible for his legal bills as a breach of contractual obligation between himself and the university as he followed every policy and procedue outlined to … ; 8 $0.80 Add
From
Ogden’s Research on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide

Ogden’s Research on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Beginning of their analysis of Russell Ogden’s case regarding the subpoena he received on his research into assisted suicide, looks at his history with Simon Fraser University’s … ; 11 $1.10 Add