Ted Palys

Showing 17–31 of 31 results

Title & Subtitle Abstract Contributors Pages Year Purchase
From
Protecting Research Participants, or Protecting the University from Research Participants?

Protecting Research Participants, or Protecting the University from Research Participants?

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at institutional conflict of interest when it comes to academic research involving human participants, ethics under the law, and the limited confidentiality afforded to researchers ; 11 $1.10 Add
From
“Researchers Should Be Aware of the Relevant Law”

“Researchers Should Be Aware of the Relevant Law”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

The seeking out of a formal legal opinion regarding research confidentiality and examining other cases involving research confidentiality and their outcomes ; 21 $2.10 Add
From
Select Bibliography

Select Bibliography

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Might want to include with each chapter ; 11 $1.10 Add
From
SFU’s Administrative Culture:

SFU’s Administrative Culture:

“Up On Dat Mountain, Dey Is Stuck Real Good”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Our campaign to persuade the SFU administration to institute an independent review of the “Ogden decision” benefitted from the more general turmoil at SFU during a period when the … ; 10 $1.00 Add
From
SFU’s “Hollow and Timid” Defence of Academic Freedom

SFU’s “Hollow and Timid” Defence of Academic Freedom

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

The independent inquiry into the university’s decision making regarding Russell Odgen’s research and the release of Judge Daniel Steinberg’s decision on Ogden vs. SFU ; 5 $0.50 Add
From
The Coroner, the Media, and SFU

The Coroner, the Media, and SFU

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at Assisted Suicide in the News, The media and Ogden – their want of an expert and finding one in Ogden, Ogden and the SFU Administration ; 12 $1.20 Add
From
The Federal Government’s Research Ethics Agenda

The Federal Government’s Research Ethics Agenda

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at developing a Canadian research ethics code when involving human participants the tri-council working group drafted a code for those seeking to apply for funding from the three major … ; 8 $0.80 Add
From
The “Jimmy” Interview:

The “Jimmy” Interview:

The Importance of “Good Facts”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Although such cases are extremely rare, if one did arise, we wanted to make sure researchers, REBs, universities, and granting agencies all know what it means to defend confidentiality to the … ; 13 $1.30 Add
From
The National Scene

The National Scene

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at the creation of the TCPS creating a bureaucratication of the ethics regulation process nationally ; 19 $1.90 Add
From
The Russel Ogden Decision Review

The Russel Ogden Decision Review

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Examines the decision review that was conducted by the university regarding Russell Ogden’s research, clearly accounts its methods and mandates ; 11 $1.10 Add
From
The TCPS Is Released

The TCPS Is Released

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Examines the release of the tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving human participants (TCPS). And how this would effect the ethics review process ; 6 $0.60 Add
From
Threats to Research Confidentiality

Threats to Research Confidentiality

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Examines the threats to research confidentiality currently being faced by academics through outlining the purpose of the book as a whole, lawful threats to research confidentiality, What is at … ; 14 $1.40 Add
From
University Accountability on Trial

University Accountability on Trial

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Looks at a unversity being accoutable to defend the research it approves against legal challenges ; 8 $0.80 Add
From
What If?

What If?

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

looks at three different sources influence on the creation of how to address when a higher ethical consideration would lead a researcher to violate a confidence ; 17 $1.70 Add
From
What the Dickens?

What the Dickens?

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Since the beginning of the debate on limited confidentiality, we have drawn attention to the ethics committee’s lack of due diligence because, in the process of imposing its doctrine on SFU … ; 16 $1.60 Add