Tom Bateman
Showing 17–32 of 96 results
| Title & Subtitle | Abstract | Contributors | Pages | Year | Purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
From  Attorney General of Ontario v. Attorney General of Canada (Reference re Abolition of Privy Council Appeals), 1947 |
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council relied on the Statute of Westminster to uphold the right of the federal parliament to enact legislation abolishing appeals to the Judicial Committee … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 6 | 2017 | $0.60 Add |
|
From  RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1995 |
A divided Supreme Court of Canada issued several opinions on whether a law prohibiting advertising and promotion of tobacco products and the requirement on tobacco manufacturers to place an … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 12 | 2017 | $1.20 Add |
|
From Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2004 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that the bylaws of co-ownership of residential buildings, which prohibited construction on the balconies of units, infringed religious freedom under … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 9 | 2017 | $0.90 Add |
|
From The Supreme Court Since 1949: Introduction |
Introduction to key Supreme Court decisions since 1949 | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 3 | 2017 | $0.30 Add |
|
From Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 |
The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the right of a Sikh student to wear a kirpan to high school on the basis of freedom of religion. | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 11 | 2017 | $1.10 Add |
|
From Reference re Anti-Inflation Act, 1976 (Anti-Inflation Reference) |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the federal Anti-Inflation Act on the ground that the government was justified in intervening in an economic crisis amounting to an emergency, … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 13 | 2017 | $1.30 Add |
|
From R. v. Hydro-Québec, 1997 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada upheld enabling statutory provisions of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, empowering federal ministers to determine what substances are toxic to … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 15 | 2017 | $1.50 Add |
|
From Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, 2013 |
The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously held that although provisions of The Saskatchewan Human Rights Code prohibiting hate speech infringed freedom of expression and freedom of conscience and … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 12 | 2017 | $1.20 Add |
|
From Canadian Western Bank v. Alberta, 2007 |
The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously upheld provisions of the Alberta Insurance Act, making federally chartered banks subject to the provincial licensing scheme governing promotion of … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 11 | 2017 | $1.10 Add |
|
From Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan, 2015 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that a law prohibiting designated employees from participating in a strike substantially interfered with a right to a meaningful process of … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 9 | 2017 | $0.90 Add |
|
From Reference re Securities Act, 2011 |
The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously held that a proposed federal Securities Act was invalid under Parliament’s general trade and commerce power, but did not rule out the possibility of … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 5 | 2017 | $0.50 Add |
|
From Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), 2002 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada struck down a law denying the right to vote to anyone serving two years or more in a correctional institution. The dissenting opinion found temporary … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 13 | 2017 | $1.30 Add |
|
From Harper v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 |
The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously held that third-party spending limits imposed by the Canada Elections Act were so low as to infringe free expression under the Canadian Charter of Rights … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 10 | 2017 | $1.00 Add |
|
From Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 |
A divided Supreme Court of Canada ruled that most provisions of the federal Assisted Human Reproduction Act were an invalid intrusion on provincial jurisdiction by attempting to regulate … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 6 | 2017 | $0.60 Add |
|
From Constitutional Change: Introduction |
Introduction to key Supreme Court decisions related to the Constitution | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 8 | 2017 | $0.80 Add |
|
From R v. Oakes, 1986 |
In striking down a section of the Narcotic Control Act that presumed possession for the purpose of trafficking, the Supreme Court of Canada established a test to determine whether a limit on a … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 7 | 2017 | $0.70 Add |
