Civil Rights
Showing 225–240 of 312 results
| Title & Subtitle | Abstract | Contributors | Pages | Year | Purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
From  Remedies |
Analysis of the remedial framework under s. 24 of the Charter and s. 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982, plus a review of specific remedies including declaratory relief, injunctions, damages and … | Kent Roach; Robert J. Sharpe | 37 | 2017 | $3.70 Add |
|
From  Reference re Alberta Statutes (Alberta Press Case), 1938 |
Two members of the Supreme Court of Canada, in holding that the Act to ensure the Publication of Accurate News and Information was beyond the constitutional authority of Alberta legislature, … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 6 | 2017 | $0.60 Add |
|
From  Rights and Freedoms of the CharterFrom: Constitutional Law, 5/e |
Overview of how the Supreme Court has interpreted fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, equality rights and language rights in the Charter context. | Byron Shaw; Padraic Ryan; Patrick J. Monahan | 23 | 2017 | $2.30 Add |
|
From  Rights-Based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in CanadaThe Charter Framework |
Exploration of the extent to which a domestic constitutional framework exists in Canada for a rights-based approach to housing and anti-poverty strategies. | Bruce Porter; Martha Jackman | 42 | 2014 | $4.20 Add |
|
From Rights in the Criminal Process |
Analysis of how the Charter has affected criminal proceedings, particularly in relation to the concept of fundamental justice, unreasonable search and seizure, arbitrary detention and … | Kent Roach; Robert J. Sharpe | 60 | 2017 | $6.00 Add |
|
From  RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1995 |
A divided Supreme Court of Canada issued several opinions on whether a law prohibiting advertising and promotion of tobacco products and the requirement on tobacco manufacturers to place an … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 12 | 2017 | $1.20 Add |
|
From Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 |
The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the right of a Sikh student to wear a kirpan to high school on the basis of freedom of religion. | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 11 | 2017 | $1.10 Add |
|
From Robertson and Rosetanni v. The Queen, 1963 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada, in looking at the effect of the Lord’s Day Act rather than its purpose, upheld a conviction for operating a bowling alley in contravention of the … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 13 | 2017 | $1.30 Add |
|
From Roncarelli v. Duplessis, 1959 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that the Quebec premier was liable under the Civil Code for damages for purporting to authorize and instruct the manager of the Quebec Liquor … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 6 | 2017 | $0.60 Add |
|
From Ford v. Quebec (Attorney General), 1988 |
The Supreme Court of Canada struck down a Quebec law requiring public signs and posters and commercial advertising to be in French only, and allowing only the French version of a firm name to be used. | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 19 | 2017 | $1.90 Add |
|
From  Sabbath Observance and Employment Accommodations |
This chapter examines holy day observance in Canada, and the workplace accomodations required for the practice of religious beliefs. | M.H. Ogilvie | 13 | 2017 | $1.30 Add |
|
From  Saskatchewan and the Gatekeeping Debate |
Discussion of the gatekeeping function of human rights commissions, using 2011 amendments to The Saskatchewan Human Rights Code as a case study. | Genevieve Leslie | 27 | 2014 | $2.70 Add |
|
From Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan, 2015 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that a law prohibiting designated employees from participating in a strike substantially interfered with a right to a meaningful process of … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 9 | 2017 | $0.90 Add |
|
From Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan, 2015 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held that a law prohibiting designated employees from participating in a strike substantially interfered with a right to a meaningful process of … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 13 | 2017 | $1.30 Add |
|
From Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, 2013 |
The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously held that although provisions of The Saskatchewan Human Rights Code prohibiting hate speech infringed freedom of expression and freedom of conscience and … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 12 | 2017 | $1.20 Add |
|
From Saskatchewan’s One Bright Shining Moment, At Least It Seemed So at the Time |
Examination of the enactment of The Saskatchewan Human Rights Code in 1979. | Ken Norman | 24 | 2014 | $2.40 Add |
