Confidentiality & Ethics
Showing 33–47 of 47 results
Title & Subtitle | Abstract | Contributors | Pages | Year | Purchase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
From The TCPS Is Released |
Examines the release of the tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving human participants (TCPS). And how this would effect the ethics review process | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 6 | 2014 | $0.60 Add |
From The Russel Ogden Decision Review |
Examines the decision review that was conducted by the university regarding Russell Ogden’s research, clearly accounts its methods and mandates | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 11 | 2014 | $1.10 Add |
From “Researchers Should Be Aware of the Relevant Law” |
The seeking out of a formal legal opinion regarding research confidentiality and examining other cases involving research confidentiality and their outcomes | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 21 | 2014 | $2.10 Add |
From Implementing Wigmore Part I:Prerequisites for Consideration |
Looks at what it means to prepare for Wigmore consideration. This chapter examins the first three criteria by drawing on Ogden’s successful application of them | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 25 | 2014 | $2.50 Add |
From Implementing Wigmore Part II:When the Rubber Hits the Road |
Examiniation of criteria four of the Wigmore consideration, a review of the interests that third parties have pitted against research confidentiality, the research and research participant in US … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 29 | 2014 | $2.90 Add |
From Kangaroo Court |
Looks at the appeal and disagreement procedure that was launch when the ethics committee rejected the proposal of research into off-street prostitution trade in Vancouver. The length of time for … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 18 | 2014 | $1.80 Add |
From Limited Confidentiality 2.0:The SFU Ethics Committee’s “Duty to Report” |
Looks at how the ethics committee’s duty to report policy violated the legal principles established in Smith v Jones | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 13 | 2014 | $1.30 Add |
From Making Ethics More Legal, or Law More Ethical? |
The creatiion of a new ethics policy at SFU, disciplinary standards regarding ethics and law, the granting agencies clarify their position on ethics and law, three legal opinions on … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 26 | 2014 | $2.60 Add |
From What If? |
looks at three different sources influence on the creation of how to address when a higher ethical consideration would lead a researcher to violate a confidence | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 17 | 2014 | $1.70 Add |
From The National Scene |
Looks at the creation of the TCPS creating a bureaucratication of the ethics regulation process nationally | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 19 | 2014 | $1.90 Add |
From Answer to a Riddle |
Looks at how TCPS-2 is an improvement as it emphasized the fundamental importance of confidentiality to research | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 4 | 2014 | $0.40 Add |
From University Accountability on Trial |
Looks at a unversity being accoutable to defend the research it approves against legal challenges | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 8 | 2014 | $0.80 Add |
From The “Jimmy” Interview:The Importance of “Good Facts” |
Although such cases are extremely rare, if one did arise, we wanted to make sure researchers, REBs, universities, and granting agencies all know what it means to defend confidentiality to the … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 13 | 2014 | $1.30 Add |
From Going the Distance |
In this concluding chapter we bring together the main themes of our examination of the ethics and law of research confidentiality by reflecting on how much things have changed — or not … | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 33 | 2014 | $3.30 Add |
From Select Bibliography |
Might want to include with each chapter | John Lowman; Ted Palys | 11 | 2014 | $1.10 Add |