Research Participants

Showing 49–64 of 73 results

Title & Subtitle Abstract Contributors Pages Year Purchase
From

Caveat Emptor Ethics

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at limited confidentiality and liability in terms of academic research using the SFU and Ogden as the main case study to anaylze the problem ; 10 $1.00 Add
From

What We Could Build, and How We Can Address Inequality

From: Share the Wealth!

Preview

Readings in part 3 of this title explore the disticition between income inequality and wealth inequaltiy and methods for building shared wealth for Canadians. This reading explores what Canada … ; 22 $2.20 Add
From

An Unusual Research Opportunity

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at a proposal regarding ethnographic research on prostitution and the ethics committee’s response to it at SFU, analyzes the question does all research matter, and looks at addressing … ; 18 $1.80 Add
From

Appendix 4

Social Return on Investment

From: Inner City Renovation

Preview

- 6 $0.60 Add
From

Will We Share the Wealth

From: Share the Wealth!

Preview

Readings in part 3 of this title explore the disticition between income inequality and wealth inequaltiy and methods for building shared wealth for Canadians. ; 7 $0.70 Add
From

Afterword

From: Share the Wealth!

Preview

Afterword ; 5 $0.50 Add
From

SFU’s Administrative Culture:

“Up On Dat Mountain, Dey Is Stuck Real Good”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Our campaign to persuade the SFU administration to institute an independent review of the “Ogden decision” benefitted from the more general turmoil at SFU during a period when the … ; 10 $1.00 Add
From

SFU’s “Hollow and Timid” Defence of Academic Freedom

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

The independent inquiry into the university’s decision making regarding Russell Odgen’s research and the release of Judge Daniel Steinberg’s decision on Ogden vs. SFU ; 5 $0.50 Add
From

Dialogue with the Ethics Committee Continues

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at the further dialogue with the ethics committee in an effort to get their research underwhere before the opportunity vanished ; 8 $0.80 Add
From

What the Dickens?

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Since the beginning of the debate on limited confidentiality, we have drawn attention to the ethics committee’s lack of due diligence because, in the process of imposing its doctrine on SFU … ; 16 $1.60 Add
From

The TCPS Is Released

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Examines the release of the tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving human participants (TCPS). And how this would effect the ethics review process ; 6 $0.60 Add
From

The Russel Ogden Decision Review

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Examines the decision review that was conducted by the university regarding Russell Ogden’s research, clearly accounts its methods and mandates ; 11 $1.10 Add
From

“Researchers Should Be Aware of the Relevant Law”

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

The seeking out of a formal legal opinion regarding research confidentiality and examining other cases involving research confidentiality and their outcomes ; 21 $2.10 Add
From

Implementing Wigmore Part I:

Prerequisites for Consideration

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at what it means to prepare for Wigmore consideration. This chapter examins the first three criteria by drawing on Ogden’s successful application of them ; 25 $2.50 Add
From

Implementing Wigmore Part II:

When the Rubber Hits the Road

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Examiniation of criteria four of the Wigmore consideration, a review of the interests that third parties have pitted against research confidentiality, the research and research participant in US … ; 29 $2.90 Add
From

Kangaroo Court

From: Protecting Research Confidentiality

Preview

Looks at the appeal and disagreement procedure that was launch when the ethics committee rejected the proposal of research into off-street prostitution trade in Vancouver. The length of time for … ; 18 $1.80 Add