Indigenous Politics
Showing 81–96 of 112 results
| Title & Subtitle | Abstract | Contributors | Pages | Year | Purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
From  Neocolonialism, or Selling Our Birthright |
Indigenous activist Arthur Manuel explains how the neocolonial structure of government funding from the Department of Indian Affairs takes hold of Indigenous leaders and why leadership for … | Arthur Manuel | 6 | 2017 | $0.60 Add |
|
From  NEW! Strategic and Regional Environmental Assessments |
This chapter introduces the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)provisions of the Act, including an examination of the strengths and weaknesses of each provision. Their assessment is informed … | Bram Noble; Jason MacLean | 16 | 2021 | $1.60 Add |
|
From NEW! Impact Assessment for Projects on Federal Lands and Outside CanadaThe “Federal Projects” Process |
This chapter explores the process set out in the Assessment Act (IAA) for the assessment of projects on federal lands and projects outside Canada; how this process differs from the rest of the … | Jamie Kneen | 24 | 2021 | $2.40 Add |
|
From Where Have the Leaders Gone? |
Indigenous activist Arthur Manuel examines Section 35 of the constitution of Canada and leadership in Indigenous communities with specific examples from British Columbia. | Arthur Manuel | 4 | 2017 | $0.40 Add |
|
From Around the Mulberry Bush |
Indigenous activist Arthur Manuel analyzes the Assembly of First Nations and the compromised position of the organization leading to it consistently put aside demands for self-determination … | Arthur Manuel | 8 | 2017 | $0.80 Add |
|
From NEW! Transparency and Accountability in Decision MakingDoes the Impact Assessment Act Support Credible Decision Making? |
This chapter considers the central decision points the Assessment Act (IAA) determines the extent to which the Act codifies mechanisms to provide for transparency and accountability in decisions. … | Jason Unger | 31 | 2021 | $3.10 Add |
|
From NEW! Human Rights and the Impact Assessment ActProponents and Consultants as Duty Bearers |
This chapter argues for a human rights centred approach to the interpretation and operationalization of the provisions of the Impact Assessment Act (IAA), emphasizing the role of IA proponents … | Adebayo Majekolagbe; Sara L. Seck | 23 | 2021 | $2.30 Add |
|
From  Calder et al. v. Attorney-General of British Columbia, 1973 |
The Supreme Court of Canada was equally divided on an appeal by representatives of the Nishga Indian Tribe dismissing their action for a declaration that the aboriginal title to their territory … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 9 | 2017 | $0.90 Add |
|
From NEW! Science and Indigenous Knowledge as the Evidentiary Basis for Impact Assessment |
This chapter considers the Impact Assessment Act’s (IAA) approach to science and Indigenous knowledge by setting out the roles that science and Indigenous knowledge play in establishing the … | Martin Olszynski | 25 | 2021 | $2.50 Add |
|
From NEW! A Learning-Focused Analysis of Canada’s Impact Assessment Act |
This chapter analyzes the learning potential presented by the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) by examining opportunities for learning at multiple levels of social organization; that is, by employ … | Alan P. Diduck | 20 | 2021 | $2.00 Add |
|
From R. v. Sparrow, 1990 |
The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously upheld the setting aside of a conviction for fishing contrary to terms of an Indian band’s food fishing licence, and the order for a new trial on the … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 10 | 2017 | $1.00 Add |
|
From NEW! Entering the Next Generation of Impact Assessment in Canada |
This chapter considers each component in relation to the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) evaluations and developed an assessment of what the IAA achieves and where further reform is needed. | Meinhard Doelle | 14 | 2021 | $1.40 Add |
|
From R. v. Marshall, 1999 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that certain prohibitions on fishing in two federal regulations were invalid as being inconsistent with treaty rights under the Mi’kmaq … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 15 | 2017 | $1.50 Add |
|
From NEW! The Path Forward |
The final chapter focuses on law reform and key changes in the implementation of the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) that are needed to complete the transition of the federal assessment process to an … | Meinhard Doelle | 21 | 2021 | $2.10 Add |
|
From Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 |
The Supreme Court of Canada set out a general framework for the duty on the Crown to consult with Aboriginal peoples and accommodate their interests, and held that such duty does not extend to … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 10 | 2017 | $1.00 Add |
|
From Manitoba Metis Federation v. Canada, 2013 |
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada declared that the federal Crown failed to implement the land grant provision in section 31 of the Manitoba Act, 1870 in accordance with the honour of the … | Janet Hieber; Peter Russell; Rainer Knopff; Tom Bateman | 8 | 2017 | $0.80 Add |
